This article grabbed my attention on
the International Institute for Strategic Studies’ website.
Syria and its Neighbors breaks down
Syria’s relationship to its other neighboring Arab countries- Iran, Iraq,
Turkey, Lebanon, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Israel- and outlines their positions
as the revolution within Syria unfolds. The reoccurring theme in this piece is
that, in contrast to the air of “resilience and surprising longevity of the
Bashar al-Assad regime” that its neighboring countries have become accustomed
to over time, Syria presently finds itself in a vulnerable position, “exposed
to external predatory ambitions, sectarian-fuelled intervention and attempts to
change its strategic orientation” due to the budding revolution happening
within its borders, and developing course toward civil war (Hokayem 7).
What I found most interesting is the
author’s highlighting of Turkey’s position, as an important player in relation
to Syria, because I hadn’t thought of its geographical and political influence
in the Middle East. Turkey has already taken action toward international diplomacy
to get Assad to cooperate (by imposing sanctions, which is not something the
United States has the sole power to do, and accepting Syrian refugees). Apparently
Turkey’s location is advantageous in regards to military action, which would be
essential if Gulf States were to take to arming and supporting Syrian
opposition (10). I am all for peaceful solutions, but geographically this
maneuver does make sense, especially considering Turkey’s proximity and consequential
involvement in the situation in Syria. This is just one to the possibilities
given, and just for Turkey.
I like that this article admitted the Syrian Assad regime as being vulnerable instead of being portrayed under its usual administration of control and order. I also like that it also doesn't talk about what the U.S. has to lose or gain for a change, but analyzes other Middle Eastern countries and their part in resolving this issue.
No comments:
Post a Comment